CBS researchers want diversity – not functional stupidity
| 12. Jun 2017
By Carsten Lund Pedersen (Postdoc) and Thomas Ritter (Professor), CBS
“In academia, huge amounts of time and energy are expended on writing papers for publication in top ranked journals, in our bid to ‘play the game’ […] This can make researchers into willing journal paper technicians who focus on writing papers for leading journals within a narrow subfield. This may detract from broader scholarship with slower and less predictable results and, perhaps, with a greater likelihood of saying something really interesting and/or socially useful”.
(Alvesson and Spicer, 2012, p. 1214)[i].
In a paper aptly titled “A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations”, Alvesson and Spicer (2012) argue that organizations become functionally stupid when its members convey an absence of reflexivity and predominantly make use of their intellectual capacities in myopic ways. As the above quote illustrates, modern day academia is in danger of becoming a nexus[ii] for such functional stupidity instead of a nexus of diversity in research. One way to circumvent this functional stupidity may be through research diversity, as a multitude of different perspectives can help to see alternative angles and avoid biased blind spots[iii]. However, does CBS as a research institution allow this research diversity to exist and flourish in its research? Here, we apply the term ‘diversity’ in the meaning of research diversity, i.e. different types of research questions and different approaches to conducting research – as a supplement to the general interpretation of diversity relating to e.g. gender, culture, age composition etc.[iv].
At CBS, we like to take pride[v] in the fact that we are a business university that makes room for diversity. A case in point is the latest CBS strategy document which stipulates the following in relation to CBS’ identity: “With the distinctiveness of its diversity, CBS combines elements from conventional business schools and the “full university” model – always maintaining a focus on our impact on the society and a commitment to research and research-based education” (CBS Strategy, p. 2)[vi]. Albeit it is undoubtedly true that CBS has a unique identity in terms of bridging the business school world with the full university model, does CBS make room for diversity in its research?
“Excellent research” can take many different forms: We like to see research as an amalgam of four very different approaches – all of which advance knowledge. A research project can have either a narrow (theoretical) contribution or broad (societal) contribution as its ambition[vii]: i.e. “with this project we wish to advance theory x” vs. “with this project we want to solve problem y”. Also, a research project can either stay within or move outside the boundaries stipulated by the mainstream assumptions in a field[viii]: i.e. “with this project we focus on what we know in the field” (best practice) vs. “with this project we want to question the assumptions of the field” (next practice)[ix]. Taken together, these two dimensions span a 2×2-matrix that illustrates four very different approaches of doing research[x].
All four research approaches can lead to excellent insights that can shape how we think and act (and all four approaches similarly entail examples of bad research). The four research approaches are as follows.
Diversity of research requires that different forms of research are welcome within the organization and can co-exist. None of these quadrants compromises quality: Questioning the mainstream assumptions of a field makes it more difficult to publish in a top-journal in the foreseeable future – but it is these kinds of studies that drive and challenge our fields and research topics.
While bibliometric analysis supports “paper technicians” with its ease to manage and measure, how can we manage and measure the other three quadrants in research in order to ensure quality-based research diversity? It could be argued that one could look at early “proofs-of-concept”. Here, a paradigm creating project could document its value by showing interest from stakeholders, results from analyses and/or practical applicability – as well as recognition and approval from notable researchers and opinion leaders.
We have recently visited colleagues at MIT and Harvard. There, it quickly becomes apparent that academic institutions can make room for research diversity while driving academic excellence. Let us get inspired by these exemplars, and let academic diversity flourish. Having this kind of research diversity could make CBS thrive and add value to our many stakeholders – while advancing quality-based knowledge and research!
-
On the hunt with CBS Hunting Club – a different kind of game
Sports, culture, business and academia – CBS student societies offer it all, but only one student society shoots to kill. Since 2012, CBS Hunting Club has introduced students to a tradition dating back perhaps further than any other human pastime. CBS WIRE tagged along with the newcomers to see what training for a hunting licence is like.
10 May 2023
-
Learning from the climate laggards – Green Business Forum aims to take sustainability beyond the classroom
Sustainability is “a bit like teenage sex. We all like to say we’re doing it, but few people actually are and those who are do it poorly”. At least according to Morten Westergaard, head of climate and energy from Middelfart Municipality and panellist at the Green Business Forum at CBS. But talking can also be the start of something. For the first Green Business Forum held at CBS, students, faculty and business professionals teamed up to share ideas and address pressing questions that can push the green transition.
02 May 2023
-
“Ambitious”, “analytical” and “team player” – CBS’ new AI tool will tell you to keep these words out of job ads
Can an AI tool improve diversity? That, at least, is the idea behind Develop Diverse, a new tool being implemented at CBS to attract a more diverse pool of candidates to job postings. The programme scans job ads for biased words and suggests more inclusive alternatives. According to Sofie Gottlieb, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Lead, it has proven to increase the number of qualified applicants.
27 Apr 2023
-
CBS BIO master’s student hopes her art will spark an interest in science
Science can be difficult to comprehend. Master’s student Maja Völker is creating eye-catching paintings with scientific motifs that capture the imagination and will be exhibited at Villa Kultur on Saturday 29 April.
26 Apr 2023
-
CBS Tech Day: students want more sustainability in their education
Sustainability is everywhere. It applies to everybody, to our clothes, energy, water – and much more. This topic was also the focus of CBS Tech Day, a technology-focused conference organised by CBS students, who agreed that sustainability should be discussed more at their business school.
21 Apr 2023
-
Life in the middle of a bachelor’s: so many beginnings and endings

Sabine Anna Irbe





-
Applying to go on exchange is easier than you think
If you believe that going on exchange is difficult, you might be surprised to learn that there is a space for everyone. Grades and points from extra-curricular activities do matter to some extent, but even with grades at the lower end of the spectrum, an exchange trip is within reach.
18 Nov 2022
-
Stock markets are facing a major challenge: Algorithms
Algorithms have a hold on the stock markets that has fuelled the need for regulation. But how do we regulate what we don’t understand? The second generation of trading algorithms are designing their own investment strategies – and they are so complicated that we are unable to understand them.
12 Sep 2022
-
Assistant Professor: Stress and shame are closely linked – understand why
BOOK REVIEW: Read about new methods for managing stress in working life.
22 Oct 2021
-
How do you research ‘global mobility’ during a pandemic when travel is highly restricted?
Two researchers tell the story of how the pandemic completely altered their research topic and how they dealt with it.
23 Sep 2021
-
Professors: No, banks are not cheating small customers – those customers are actually being pampered
BOOK REVIEW: Scapegoating the finance sector has become a national sport. Imagine, banks are daring to charge negative interest. But much of the criticism is based on prejudice, claim two professors.
17 May 2021