Independent University Newspaper
Copenhagen Business School

Popular searches:

Independent University Newspaper

Copenhagen Business School

Applying for research grants is a losing game researchers must play: “It’s a lottery”

“The funding landscape in Denmark is peculiar in one sense because of the big role of private foundations in funding research. And at the same time, it’s also something that many other countries are moving towards. Private foundations are becoming increasingly important in many other countries. If we understand what’s going on in Denmark, we may also make some predictions about what’s going to happen in other, bigger countries.” Photo: Shutterstock

2022 was a record year for external research funding at CBS. But behind every grant lie many more rejections – and hours of work – which you rarely hear about.

News |   30. Jun 2023

Caroline Hammargren


While doing her PhD at Imperial College in London, Valentina Tartari, now Associate Professor at the Department of Strategy and Innovation, had a supervisor who was very active in fundraising.

“That was my academic imprinting and what I’ve tried to implement during my career. I’ve always seen people writing proposals and building research groups thanks to [grants from] those.”

Valentina Tartari has been at CBS since 2012 and received her first grant, the Sapere Aude, in 2014. The grant allowed her to do a project with a research assistant and spend a semester at MIT, while she was an assistant professor.

Since, she has continued applying for grants to support her preferred research method – working in a team. With another professor, she now leads a research group consisting of a postdoc, a PhD student and a database manager. Next year, they will be joined by two more colleagues.

“I want to work with PhD students and postdocs, and in order to get them, I need to pay them. And the only way to pay them is for me to find money somewhere. I like to have a lab and work with people, not just on my own, which means you need to spend quite a bit of time on fundraising.

“That’s not the only way of doing research in the social sciences, actually, it’s probably a bit of a minority way. But this is what a lot of people are moving towards, because we need bigger investments in infrastructure, in data. And all these things cost a lot of money that the university doesn’t provide.”

Valentina Tartari’s experience of research funding comes not only from applying for it – she also studies it.

Valentina Tartari prefers doing research in a group, for which she needs external funding: “It’s a lot of work to have postdocs and PhDs. You have to follow them and be mindful of their career. And you end up helping them. If they stay in academia, it’s a kind of a bond that goes on forever. So, it’s a big investment as well.” Photo: Caroline Hammargren

As an economist in the field of science, she looks at how knowledge is produced in universities and then commercialised to become technology.

“I study scientists and how they produce knowledge, so the funding system is part of that. My interest is in how different institutions affect the kind of science and knowledge we produce, and how that knowledge is disseminated to society, to industry. So, for me it’s interesting to understand how different configurations of the funding system may give different outcomes in terms of what we produce, but also different outcomes in terms of who participates in science.”

One of her current projects is called The Effects of Research Funding on the Rate and Direction of Science. The natural sciences depend much more on external funds. Research is conducted in groups of researchers and requires equipment, materials and laboratories.

“Natural science research is very, very expensive. Conducting social science research has not been as expensive – we don’t need laboratories.”

But, she says, there is a shift where expensive data, servers and external funding are becoming more important. It may be harder for social science researchers to do research without funding in the future.

The journey also matters

Indeed, external funding is on the rise. 2022 was a record year for external research funding at CBS with grants totalling DKK 211 million, compared to DKK 150 million in 2021.

The increase is due especially to a few large grants, including DKK 59.4 million for The Center for Big Data in Finance (BIGFI) funded by the Danish National Research Foundation. CBS also received a record amount of funding from the EU.

CBS’ strategy is to increase its external funding. The goal is to obtain grants worth DKK 162 million per year.

In that, the Research Support Office (RSO), a fourteen-person office located on a quiet floor of Porcelænshaven, is instrumental.

Their main task is to assist CBS researchers with funding applications. The office is divided into teams covering national funds, private funds and European funds – the main funding streams from which CBS gets its external funding. They screen for appropriate funding calls, help match up researchers with opportunities, and then support them in putting together applications for submission. If funds are awarded, they also help with contract agreements.

Development in approval rates 2021 – 2022. Source: Research Support Office


Applying for research grants can take up a large share of academics’ time. Researchers at Danish universities spend on average 9% of their work time applying for external funding.

Valentina Tartari has found the Research Support Office useful – especially for drafting the budgets.

“It’s not the same as writing a paper, so it requires a bit of experience. It needs to be tailored to the funder that you’re submitting your proposal to. You need to understand what they want, what’s going to work with them, what’s going to interest them. It takes a lot of time.”

On top of that, the likelihood of getting the money is small.

“Sometimes it’s very close to a lottery, especially for the most elite funding. So, you need to decide if you want to allocate your time to something that has a very small chance of success. And that is time you have to find yourself.”

Photo: Shutterstock

While more funding sounds positive, it is not without its challenges. A new report from DEA, a think tank established by the Danish Society for Education and Business (DSEB) highlights some of the side-effects of external funding – for researchers and research.

Too much competition for external funding could mean universities lose promising young researchers. Less risk appetite among funders may lead to missing out on potentially valuable but high-risk research. And the more universities depend on external financing, the less they are able to independently prioritise and steer their research.

In addition, bringing in external funding has a financial cost. The University of Copenhagen estimates that for every DKK 100 of external grants brought in, the university has to spend DKK 70.

A life of disappointment

While the CBS homepage often features stories about new research grants, a more common story, which rarely makes the headlines, is that of rejections.

Secrecy around applications is not uncommon.

“I don’t like to give away my ideas either, but I don’t mind people knowing that I apply. Even if I don’t get it right, I don’t feel ashamed.”

Perhaps it helps that she studies the subject, and has been successful, though she has also been rejected.

“It’s always a disappointment. Academic life is full of disappointments. We send papers that are rejected most of the time. We send applications that are rejected most of the time. It doesn’t matter how many times you experience it, but that’s the way it is in a sense.

“They are your ideas, right? It’s not nice when people tell you that your ideas are not good enough.”

While academics may have to live with rejections, she believes universities could help ease the blow.

“There needs to be some incentive and reward built in, even for the people who are not successful. Otherwise, you’re rewarding people based on a lottery.

Do you think CBS could do more to value the failed applications?

They should put more value on the act of applying for funding, because that’s the one that requires effort.”

Specifically, she thinks, giving researchers more time to spend on applications.

If at first you don’t succeed…

Rejections are also something Valentina Tartari studies in one of her research projects.

“One thing about funding is that most of the time you don’t get it. And because we’re human beings, we don’t like rejections. So, who persists? Who keeps asking for money, especially if you’re in fields where you can’t do research without external funding, like the natural sciences? If certain groups are disproportionately likely to leave the race, then by giving all those rejections, we’re actually discouraging them very early on from pursuing a scientific career. We may end up with some imbalance in the system. I think this is something that is interesting to understand.”

Her project has just started, so she has no findings to share. But one question she is exploring is how much the funding system is responsible for the gender gap in science.

On the table in her office, a blue and red portrait of Ruth Bader Ginsberg in fuse beads leans against the wall. By her picture, the quote: “Women belong in all places where decisions are being made” is written. She says she likes to have it there for her female students to see.

For once in her career, Valentina Tartari is not spending late hours on funding applications. Only when asked to support or peer review for colleagues – also a part of the application process.

But external funding will most likely be part of the game for the foreseeable future – perhaps to some an unfair lottery, but one that values grit.

Or as Valentina Tartari puts it:

“What they tell my younger colleagues when they apply for funding is that you just don’t take no for an answer, you try again. That’s the only way. Persistence is the key.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Applying for research grants is a losing game researchers must play: “It’s a lottery”by

  • News

    Staff layoffs: What happens if you’re fired

    The clock is ticking. On Thursday morning (5 October), CBS employees will know if they are up for dismissal or not. But what will happen on the day? What emotional stages are you likely to encounter? And who will be there to pick you up when you are feeling the blow of being laid off? CBS WIRE has talked to HR and the consulting agency Actief Hartmanns to provide you with answers.

  • News

    Network, network, network – CBS graduates advise on getting your first job

    There are many approaches to finding your first job. Three recent CBS graduates talk about how they landed theirs. Their approaches were quite different, yet they all highlight networking as a key element.

  • News

    A-Z of the dismissals

    In these final days of September, the fate of a number of CBS employees is being decided. The final amount of money saved on salaries via voluntary severance agreements (aka redundancy packages, Ed.) and senior agreements will be known.  After this, the actual number of employees up for dismissal will be decided by management – and then the individuals will be selected.

  • News

    Layoffs break the crucial trust between organisation and employee

    CBS is laying off a number of employees soon, which will affect our university in different ways. When employees are fired without having done anything wrong, it shatters the trust between the organisation and employees, while also taking a toll on productivity, according to a CBS expert. Layoffs also affect the ‘survivors’, who are forced to adapt to a changed workload and the loss of cherished colleagues.

  • News

    Here to help – at the touch of a button and at Campus Desk

    Exam anxiety? Lost student card? I’ve wedged my car between a Fiat 500 and a lamp post, can you help? You never know what you’ll be asked next. But that’s just how the Campus Desk team like it. And if they can’t fix your problem, they’ll know someone who can. CBS WIRE asked the team about the whole range of topics they advice on every day.

  • Gif of the week
  • News

    CBS Quiz Time: Unraveling the success story

    A successful university environment such as CBS is often associated with academic pursuits, but campus life extends far beyond the classroom. At CBS Quiz Time, a student society motivated by creative thinking and social engagement, students join in a refreshing range of creativity, excitement, and social interaction. CBS WIRE talked to Celine Møller-Andersen to find out about the society’s vision, strategies and the factors that are driving its rapid expansion.

  • News

    Why so sudden? The CBS financial crisis explained

    Employees and union representatives have posed many questions in the wake of the 17 August announcement of a firing round. In this interview, University Director Arnold Boon explains how Senior Management has been working with the budget and a change of financial strategy since the fall of 2022, and why layoffs are now necessary.

Follow CBS students studying abroad

CBS WIRE collaborates with

Stay connected